Thursday, June 24, 2010

Employment Growth vs. Population Growth by Decade


A very simple calculation reveals that the working age population (16 through 64), increased by 22 million in the first decade of the 21st century; employment growth for the decade was only 1 million jobs in the working age population. Total employment growth for the decade was only 3.2 million, two thirds of total employment growth went to persons 65 yrs. and older.

Disturbing economic data that the "headline" unemployment statistic (U-3) does not describe. Employment growth, verses population growth in the decade of 2000-09, seriously underperformed preceding decades. The under-performance was apparent before the employment contraction in 2008;  the May 2010 adjustments of Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) are now available, so I'm revisiting the topic.

Employment Growth vs. Population Growth by Decade:

The data we are looking at is the growth in Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) "Employment Levels" as compared to the BLS Civilian noninstitutional "Population" -- "Growth in Employment" and "Growth in Population" respectively. Growth in Population is our children and growth from immigration -- Growth in Employment is the net employment growth at the end of the decade.


Civilian noninstitutional population (Age 16 and over)

Click images to enlarge


Employment Growth to Population Growth: by Decade (Age 16 and Over)
(Numbers in Thousands)

1950's
Growth in Population = 11,516
Growth in Employment = 7,215

Growth: Employment to Population = 63%

1960's
Growth in Population = 19,449
Growth in Employment = 13,862

Growth: Employment to Population = 71%

1970's
Growth in Population = 30,811
Growth in Employment = 21,224

Growth: Employment to Population = 69%

1980's
Growth in Population = 20,865
Growth in Employment = 17,685

Growth: Employment to Population = 85%

1990's
Growth in Population = 21,667
Growth in Employment = 16,998

Growth: Employment to Population 78%

2000's
Growth in Population = 28,092
Growth in Employment = 3,257

Growth: Employment to Population = 12%


In the preceding table and graph we see that employment growth has fallen to 12% of population growth. The population growth includes all persons 16 and over, the following table excludes retirement age adults, showing only those age 16 to 64.

Civilian noninstitutional population (Age 16 through 64 )


Employment Growth to Population Growth: by Decade (Age 16 through 64)
(Numbers in Thousands)

1950's
Growth in Population = 7,559
Growth in Employment = 7,117

Growth: Employment to Population = 94%

1960's
Growth in Population = 15,772
Growth in Employment = 13,817

Growth: Employment to Population = 88%

1970's
Growth in Population = 25,569
Growth in Employment = 21,291

Growth: Employment to Population = 83.3%

1980's
Growth in Population = 15,470
Growth in Employment = 17,335

Growth: Employment to Population = 112%

1990's
Growth in Population = 18,591
Growth in Employment = 16,366

Growth: Employment to Population 88%

2000's
Growth in Population = 22,268
Growth in Employment = 1,048

Growth: Employment to Population = 5%

Only 1 million of 3.2 million jobs were assumed by working age adults -- ages 16 to 64. This is one job for every twenty-two new entrants into to workforce. For those persons of retirement age, 65 and older, the employment picture was a little different.


Civilian noninstitutional population (Age 65 and older)





Employment Growth to Population Growth: by Decade (Age 65 and Over)
(Numbers in Thousands)

1950's
Growth in Population = 3,957
Growth in Employment = 98

Growth: Employment to Population = 2%

1960's
Growth in Population = 3,677
Growth in Employment = 45

Growth: Employment to Population = 1%

1970's
Growth in Population = 5,242
Growth in Employment = (67)

Growth: Employment to Population = -1.3%

1980's
Growth in Population = 5,395
Growth in Employment = 350

Growth: Employment to Population = 6%

1990's
Growth in Population = 3,076
Growth in Employment = 632

Growth: Employment to Population 21%

2000's
Growth in Population = 5,824
Growth in Employment = 2,209

Growth: Employment to Population = 38%


From the data, there is no way to tell if the retirement age persons aged into this category in their current job, or re-entered the workforce.

In either case, shouldn't this trend in employment be represented in any and all talks about Comprehensive Immigration Reform?

(Note: A similar workup of pre-economic meltdown data located Here)

Let's end this blog with a quote:

"...we estimate that a total of almost 600,000 temporary visas authorizing employment were issued in 2008, including about 380,000 workers receiving one of the employment-based temporary visas primarily intended for work (H-1B, H-2A, H-2B, O, L)."
Aligning Temporary Immigration Visas With US Immigration Needs: The Case for a New System of Provisional Visas

Definition of a decade is Dec. 31, xxx9 to Dec. 31, xxx9
(The last day of the prior decade to the last day of the current decade)

Source:
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey


Series Id: LNU00000000
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Unadj) Population Level
Labor force status: Civilian noninstitutional population
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Years: 1948 to 2010

Series Id: LNU02000000
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Unadj) Employment Level
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Years: 1948 to 2010

Series Id: LNU00000097
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Unadj) Population Level - 65 yrs. & over
Labor force status: Civilian noninstitutional population
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 65 years and over
Years: 1948 to 2010

Series Id: LNU02000097
Not Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Unadj) Employment Level - 65 yrs. & over
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 65 years and over
Years: 1948 to 2010

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

H-1B visa: Impact on Computer-related Occupations 2009

From 2004-09, IT employment grew by 602,000. New H-1B initial approvals in Computer related occupations was 315,249 or 52.4% of employment growth, similar temporary foreign worker categories likely raised the temporary foreign worker percentage to above 80% of employment growth. Over a similar period (2003-08), there was an abundance of new IT workers, as U.S. Citizen/Permanent Resident degree production exceeded demand at over 757,000 degrees conferred.


From 2004-09, only 2,360 jobs were created in "Computer and information scientists, research," the only category that requires a postgraduate degree (per CA PostSecondary Education Committee). Contrary to the graph above, if we exclude all new A.S. degrees, and assume all Tech support workers must have a B.S. degree, the educational system still performed adequately when foreign students are counted. (Earlier study by specialty also shows no IT talent shortage)

U.S. Computer related degrees conferred (B.S., M.S., Prof. and PhD 2003 - 08)
U.S. Citizen and Permanent Residents = 505,042
Temporary Residents = 95.898
Total Degrees, Bachelors and above = 600,940
Computer related employment growth (2004-09) = 602,180 (100%)
H-1B visa, new approvals = 315,249 (52.4%)
L-1 visas issued (2005-09) est. 50% of incoming are IT = 185,689 (30.8%)
H-1B and L-1 employment growth total = 501,118 (83.2%)
Between 315,000 and 501,000 new IT jobs were assumed by H-1B and L-1 temporary workers. Excluding the degrees conferred to Temporary Residents, the unemployment rate for this segment of the workforce would be between 26.6% and/or 67.1% respectively.  Speaking of unemployment, a modest 3% unemployment rate for the occupation provides another 96,000 persons in the ready workforce.



Referring to the Graph above:

H-1B and L-1 must have an employment offer to enter the U.S. and must remain employed H-1B and L-1 est. increases amounted to 80% of employment growth from 2004-09 Hiring counts of Citizen and PermRes are nearly identical to U.S. postgraduate degrees conferred Postgrad degree now preferred for Citizens/PermRes while undergrad degree for H-1 B, L-1 Undergraduate Citizen and PermRes are displaced by H-1B, L-1 or "crowd out" older Professionals The Computer related occupations are oversubscribed with foreign undergraduate level professionals.

The Question:
How did we arrive at the point where 52% of all new IT hires are H-1B and historically about 50% of all H-1B are in IT occupations?

The, "U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Occupational Statistics and Employment Projections," predicted that Computer Specialist occupational levels would reach 4.2 million, an increase of 1.9 million (82%) by 2010.  The predicted "dire shortages" of Computer specialists did not occur because employment levels only reached 3.2 million in 2009.

Employers claim that they need this "slack" in the employment market and need access to the brightest in the world -- for the years in question, employment levels that require a postgraduate degree only grew by 2,360.

Recommendation:

The 2/3 employment retention rule:
Business immigration is privilege, not a right, the most damaging aspect of the H-1B program is that it is unrestricted during recessions and unrestricted during the early stages of recovery.  When water is splashed from a puddle, it is replaced with other water; in the case of unstoppable flow foreign labor, unemployment becomes permanent when an oversupply of  labor exists during and after recession..

Metering the intake of  foreign workers is extremely important when the business cycle is declining.  Measured by occupations, the temporary foreign worker educational requirements should be adjusted upward when the count of new temporary workers exceeds 1/3 of employment growth statistic (more below).   While keeping the door open for the brightest and best postgraduates (58% in 2009) and allowing the business cycle to run its course, the intake of undergraduate foreign professionals would be halted during recession and through early stages of recovery.

Three types of professionals are involved, but two of these professionals are the same person in a different time period: the U.S. professional, the temporary professional (H-1B), the dual-intent professional. Both the citizen and the dual-intent professional are interested in retaining permanent U.S. employment, the temporary professional is presumed to be mobile. From this perspective, the number of temporary foreign professionals should not exceed 1/3 of the long term employment growth statistic because there is already another, more seasoned, temporary professional who may choose to become a citizen.

.In an oversubscribed occupation such as IT, temporary layoffs in these permanent positions are often filled with new foreign workers instead of the separated worker.  In raising visa educational requirements when a 1/3 oversubscription occurs, temporary visa are still available to the industry while population ratio recovers. In a recovering business cycle, unemployed and new student professional are favored due to visa restrictions. As the business cycle peaks, the restrictions on visa educational requirements are reduced.

The employment growth statistic would cover a period equal to the maturity of the temporary visa.  The 2/3 employment retention rule protects citizens, permanent residents and persons adjusting status from permanent employment separation during recession.  The 2/3 employment retention rule would discourage offshore outsourcing because a reduction in staff causes an immigration restriction within the occupation for the following year(s). The rule would allow separated workers and new college graduates a short term "grace" period while the economy is suffering and recovering from recession. Finally, the 2/3 employment reservation rule would help ensure that employment based immigration policy leans toward employment retention of current and future citizens.

This paper examines a six year period of:
Occupational Employment Growth
Employment based visas granted or employment approvals in the H-1B and L-1 categories
U.S. college degrees conferred in Computer related occupations.



H-1B Visa Impact on Computer Related Occupations 2009

We finally have the USCIS, "Characteristics of Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B):" reports. These H-1B reports are important because they publish the numbers of visas approved and the occupations of the new H-1B non-immigrant worker(s). Lou Dobbs started reporting about the excessive amount of H-1B workers affecting Computer related occupations in about 2006-07. The 2006-07 H-1B Characteristics reports, mandated by Congress, went unpublished for the remainder of the Bush Presidency.

Occupational Employment Data:
The Office of Employment Statistics (OES) has released its May 2009, estimates of the occupational employment and current wages. To determine the impact of these non-immigrant visa programs in the occupation, the first step is to find the employment growth in Computer related occupations.


Six year Growth in Computer related occupations 2004 - 2009
 Entry Level Education Prereq (STEPS)

Computer and information scientists, research = 2,360 PhD
Computer programmers = ( -35,340) BS
Computer software engineers, applications = 84,920 BS
Computer software engineers, systems software = 92,680 BS
Computer support specialists = 60,040 AS
Computer systems analysts = 27,000 BS
Database administrators = 10,540 BS
Network and computer systems administrators = 94,280 BS
Network systems and data communications analysts = 69,810 BS
Computer specialists, all other = 195,890 AS

Occupational Employment growth = 602,180

Even though the Computer related occupations lost (-1,120) jobs in 2009, employment growth of 602,180 jobs is a lot better than some of the other periods I've looked at. These were pretty good employment growth years, between recessions and notably , the Tech sector started hiring again in 2004.

I've sampled a six year growth period, because six years is the duration of the standard H-1B temporary foreign worker visa, with a three year initial and a three year continuing employment period.

Temporary Foreign Worker Data:
By the numbers, virtually all H-1B visas are renewed, or extended, counts of continuing employment approvals consistently exceed initial employment approvals. Excess visa counts in continuing approvals are due to a combination of continuing 3 year employment approvals and greencard (AC21) extensions, but these are still H-1B workers just the same.  The H-1B count is this report are limited to initial employment approvals in Computer related occupations.

An H-1B non-immigrant worker cannot enter the U.S. without employment, so we know that a certain amount of occupational growth is/was reserved for H-1B initial employment.


Occupational Employment growth = 602,180
H-1B initial emp. approvals 2004 - 09 = 315,429 (52%)

Occupational Subtotal = 286,751


The H-1B is not the only non-immigrant visa that adversely affects Computer related occupations. The "Intra-company" L-1 visa, is also a three year visa, but differs with a single two year extension for workers and can be extended twice for managers. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has studied the L-1 visa and poses the question in a section heading, "Is the L-1, The Computer visa?" ...quoted from the same section... "From 1999 to 2004, nine of the ten firms that petitioned for the most L-1 workers were computer and IT related outsourcing service firms that specialize in labor from India."

Like the H-1B visa, the L-1 visa is also "portable" under AC21 (greencard eligible) immigration law. In this estimate I will use 50% of the L-1 (instead of the OIG estimate of 90%) and limit the duration to a single extension of 5 years total. Computer related occupations within the H-1b program is generally 50%, the L-1 should be at least half Computer related considering the OIG documentation.


Occupational Subtotal = 286,751
50% of L-1 visas issued 2005 - 09 = 185,689

Subtotal (America's share 16.78% of occupational growth) = 101,063

Consequently, Americans are resigned to accept that 83% of its Computer related employment growth is reserved for H-1b and L-1 non-immigrants. Even with the current state of the economy, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (and others) lobbies for more high-skill non-immigrant visas.

Occupational Characteristics of IT related H-1B
Of the 56,000 IT related H-1B visas granted in 2006, 55% of these new H-1B holders were undergraduates (31,000).  Sixty six percent of all (47,300 total) undergraduate H-1B initial approvals in 2006 were in Computer related (IT) occupations.  All other occupations combined only received 16,300 H-1B undergraduates.
In 2006, 44% of those receiving new H-1B visas in computer-related occupations had master’s degrees, and a little more than 1% had doctoral degrees. Over two-thirds of the slightly more than 110,000 recipients of H-1B visas in 2006 are in S&T occupations Education Levels. .


In FY 2006, 57% of [all] new H-1B visa recipients had advanced degrees, including 41% with master’s degrees, 5% with professional degree, and 11% with doctorates. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/c3/c3s4.htm
From 2004-09, only 2,360 jobs were created in "Computer and information scientists, research," the only category that requires a postgraduate degree (per CA PostSecondary Education Committee).


U.S. Educational Data:
The latest (NCES) educational data is for 2008,. I've downloaded Computer related "Degrees Conferred" data for the six year period (2003 - 2008),for comparison with the {six year} Computer related occupational growth data.



Computer related occupations
Degrees conferred 2003 - 2008

U.S. Citizens and Permanent Residents

Professional and PHD = 3,807
Masters = 106,614
Bachelors = 394,621
Associate = 252,720

Total Degrees Conferred = 757,762

Referring to the Graph above:

H-1B and L-1 must have an employment offer to enter the U.S. and must remain employed Hiring counts of Citizen and PermRes are nearly identical to postgraduate degrees conferred Undergraduate Citizen and PermRes are displaced in competition with H-1B, L-1 Employment requirements are postgraduate for Citizens/PermRes and undergrad for H-1 B, L-1.

Finally, there is a little more competition in the system -- foreign students.


Computer related occupations
Degrees conferred 2003 - 2008

Temporary Residents

Professional and PHD = 5,158
Masters = 60,290
Bachelors = 30,450
Associate = 5,114

Total = 101,012

About Educational Data:
Many foreign students will enter the H-1B or OPT programs.

Counts of degrees conferred could contain duplicates -- a B.S. holder might also have earned an A.S. during the sample period.

Some persons in the degrees conferred data may already be employed in IT, however 1 and 2 year certificate data are not included here.

Observations:
IT employers claim they need this much slack in the labor force and more H-1B is not responsive to the business cycle

The prerequisite for employment in IT has been raised to postgraduate degree for citizens/PermRes

There is an abundance of both H-1B and citizen/PermRes undergraduates

The long term plans for new H-1B are undeclared/uncertain

Employment retention must be a goal to accommodate citizens and new citizens

Conclusion:

The 2/3 employment retention rule:
Business immigration is privilege, not a right, the most damaging aspect of the H-1B program is that it is unrestricted during recessions and unrestricted during the early stages of recovery.When water is splashed from a puddle it is replaced with other water; thus, unemployment becomes permanent when an oversupply of labor exists during and after recession..

Metering the intake of foreign workers is extremely important when the business cycle is declining. Measured by occupations, the temporary foreign worker educational requirements should be adjusted upward when the count of new temporary workers exceeds 1/3 of employment growth statistic (more below). While keeping the door open for the brightest and best postgraduates (58% in 2009) and allowing the business cycle to run its course, the intake of undergraduate foreign professionals would be reduced during halted and through early stages of recovery.

Three types of professionals are involved, but two of these professionals are the same person in a different time period: the U.S. professional, the temporary professional (H-1B), the dual-intent professional. Both the citizen and the dual-intent professional are interested in retaining permanent U.S. employment, the temporary professional is presumed to be mobile. From this perspective, the number of temporary foreign professionals should not exceed 1/3 of the long term employment growth statistic because there is already another, more seasoned, temporary professional who may choose to become a citizen.

.In an oversubscribed occupation such as IT, temporary layoffs in these permanent positions are often filled with new foreign workers instead of the separated worker. In raising visa educational requirements when a 1/3 oversubscription occurs, temporary visa are still available to the industry while population ratio recovers. In a recovering business cycle, unemployed and new student professional are favored due to visa restrictions. As the business cycle peaks, the restrictions on visa educational requirements are reduced.

The employment growth statistic would cover a period equal to the maturity of the visa. The 2/3 employment retention rule protects citizens, permanent residents and persons adjusting status from permanent employment separation during recession. The 2/3 employment retention rule would discourage offshore outsourcing because a reduction in staff causes an immigration restriction within the occupation for the following year(s). The rule would allow separated workers and new college graduates a short term "grace" period while the economy is suffering and recovering from recession. Finally, the 2/3 employment reservation rule would help ensure that employment based immigration policy leans toward employment retention of current and future citizens.

See Also:
A Shortage Where None is Found
http://immigration-weaver.blogspot.com/2009/08/shortage-where-none-is-found.html

Data Sources:

U.S. Department of State
Classes of Nonimmigrants Issued Visas – FY1989-2009 Detail Table (Excel Spreadsheet)
Parent: http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/statistics/nivstats/nivstats_4582.html

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Reports
USCIS, "Characteristics of Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B): 2009
USCIS, "Characteristics of Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B): 2008
USCIS, "Characteristics of Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B): 2007
USCIS, "Characteristics of Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B): 2006
USCIS, "Characteristics of Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B): 2005
USCIS, "Characteristics of Specialty Occupation Workers (H-1B): 2004


U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Reports:
Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates

National Cross Industry Estimates
2003 - 2009


Department Homeland Security : Office of the Inspector General
Report:
Review of Vulnerabilities and Potential Abuses of the L-1 Visa Program
http://www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/katovrsght/OIG_06-22_Jan06.pdf

California PostSecondary Education Committee
http://www.cpec.ca.gov/FiscalData/StepsDetail.asp?SOC=15

National Science Foundation

Data Source: IPEDS Completions Survey by Race
Analysis Variable: Degrees/Awards Conferred by Race (NCES population of institutions)
01.0106 Agricultural Business Technology
11.0101 Computer and Information Sciences, General
11.0103 Information Technology
11.0199 Computer Science, Other
11.0201 Computer Programming/Programmer, General
11.0202 Computer Programming Special Applications
11.0299 Computer Programming, Other
11.0301 Data Processing and Data Processing Technology/Technician
11.0401 Information Science/Studies
11.0501 Computer Systems Analysis/Analyst
11.0701 Computer Science
11.0801 Web Page, Digital/Multimedia and Information Resources Design
11.0802 Data Modeling/Warehousing and Database Administration
11.0803 Computer Graphics
11.0899 Computer Software and Media Applications, Other
11.0901 Computer Systems Networking and Telecommunications
11.1001 System Administration/Administrator
11.1002 System, Networking, and LAN/WAN Management/Manager
11.1003 Computer and Information Systems Security
11.1004 Web/Multimedia Management and Webmaster
11.1099 Computer/Information Technology Services Administration and Management, Other
11.9999 Computer and Information Sciences and Support Services, Other
14.0901 Computer Engineering, General
14.0902 Computer Hardware Engineering
14.0903 Computer Software Engineering
14.0999 Computer Engineering, Other
15.1201 Computer Engineering Technology/ Technician
15.1202 Computer Technology/Computer Systems Technology
15.1204 Computer Software Technology/Technician
15.1299 Computer Engineering Technologies/Technicians, Other
26.1103 Bioinformatics
26.1199 Biomathematics and Bioinformatics, Other
51.2706 Medical Informatics
52.0208 E-Commerce/Electronic Commerce
52.1201 Management Information Systems, General
52.1299 Management Information Systems and Services, Other

Sunday, June 20, 2010

How much immigration is too much immigration?

"He [David Ricardo] posited that the growth of population and capital, pressing against a fixed supply of land, pushes up rents and holds down wages and profits." (Wikipedia: Economics)

After decades of employment growth at above 80 percent of labor force growth, employment growth has fallen below 5 percent for working age adults entering the labor force. Yet, 600,000 skilled temporary workers are added to the labor force annually, and the Bureau of Census reports that there were 12.88 million foreign born non-citizens employed in the U.S. in 2007.  In the first decade of the 21st century, only 1 million jobs were added to the working age population.

Immigration has deleterious and advantageous effects to the U.S. economy, nobody is suggesting that the U.S. should have a zero immigration policy, but how much immigration is too much immigration?

Just like the native born, the foreign born require employment, housing and government services. Most of the immigration debate is at the macro level because Congress reserves right to set immigration policy, this paper takes a look at the levels of foreign-born employment by each State and how those States are performing economically.

Displayed in the images below are the "Worst 10" States and the "Best 10" States, by ranking, based upon the following criteria:

Highest percent of foreign-born employed in labor force by State
Highest foreclosure rate by State
Highest unemployment rate by State
Highest percent state spending over budget by State
(For these columns the worst score is 1 (1st) -- the best score is 50 (50th))
(In the "Score" column, the four grades are aggregated for scoring, a perfect score would be 200)

click images to enlarge

10 Worst performing States in U.S.




10 Best performing States in U.S.



Sometimes, the best way to evaluate policy is to see which States are doing the right things and which States are doing the wrong things. The states doing wrong things financially have pervasively high rates of foreign-born in the labor force.

10 worst performing States: Employed Foreign born in labor force (ranking)
Nevada = 4th
California = 1st
Florida = 5th
Arizona = 8th
Illinois = 9th
New Jersey = 3rd
Georgia = 17th
Rhode Island = 13th
Oregon = 16th
Idaho = 26th

On the other hand, the states with the least financial difficulties have predominately lower percentages of foreign-born employment.

10 best performing States: Employed Foreign born in labor force (ranking)
Oklahoma = 28th
Louisiana = 40th
Iowa = 37th
Nebraska= 29th
West Virginia = 49th
Vermont = 42nd
South Dakota = 48th
Wyoming = 44th
Montana = 50th
North Dakota = 47th (the most fiscally responsible state in the nation)

If you are inclined to disagree with me, you could stop reading and label me a racist, but try to understand that the needs of the foreign-born population are different than population growth through birthrate. Migrants arrive with employment and housing needs on the very first day. It’s as if we had another baby-boom, except all of those kids needed employment and separate housing on the day they were born. With native children, the economy has 18 years to adjust to their growing needs; with migration the economic equilibrium is shocked, housing cost spiral upward while demand for labor wanes.

Similarities to the Great Depression:


The only hiccup in the growth of the home ownership rate in the entire last century was during the Great Depression. In the 1940 Census, the home ownership rate fell to 43.6% from 47.8% listed in the previous census (-4.2%).  Since 2005, the home ownership rate has fallen 2 percentage points nationally.

Home Ownership rates 2005 Q1
United States 69.1

Northeast 65.4
Midwest 73.1
South 71.1
West 64.9

Home Ownership rates 2010 Q1
United States 67.1 (-2.0%)
Northeast 64.4 (-1.0%)
Midwest 70.9 (-2.2%)
South 69.2 (-1.9%)
West 61.9 (-3.0%)

Source: Current Population Survey/Housing Vacancy Survey,
Series H-111 Reports, Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC 20233.



Home ownership Rates: 1900 to 2000



Prior to the Great Depression, immigration rates to the United States doubled (see post), in 1900 and 1910, the percentage of foreign born in the labor force exceeded 20%. Since 1980, the number of foreign born in the labor force has roughly quadrupled, from 7.1 million to 23.9 million in 2007.

Much like the “DotCom” recession preceded the Mortgage meltdown recession, the Great Depression was preceded by the Depression of 1920-1921. In 2007, the year of the Mortgage meltdown, the percentage of foreign born in the labor force reached the levels of the Great Depression at over 15%.

The most productive decades in the United States
had low impact from immigration.




Factoid:

2007 Foreign Born
U.S. Labor Force = 23,838,000 (15.6%)
Employed = 22,538,000 (94.5%)

2007 Native Born
U.S. Labor Force = 128,373,000
Employed = 120,050,000 (93.5%)
http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/acs-10.pdf

May 2010 (Foreign and Native born)
U-6 Unemployment = 39,424,834 (16.6%)
U-3 Unemployment = 23,037,403 (9.7%)
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm


High-skilled temporary foreign labor, Housing and Education

I’ve documented in other blog entries that there is no labor shortage and H-1B and L-1 non-immigrant workers assume more than 100% of employment growth in Computer-related occupations. (And here)

There is no need for the H-1B, nor L-1 non-immigrant visa programs. There are enough visas in the EB greencard (PERM) program to naturalize every foreign Science & Engineering postgraduate educated in the U.S. each year. The non-immigrant programs simply create a backlog in the PERM greencard system and disadvantage the both the foreign worker and native worker.  During recessions, these foreign workers displace or disadvantage domestic workers which leads to housing foreclosures.

The dual-intent temporary foreign worker programs remove the requirement to maintain a foreign residence, which in turn, removes the employer's responsibility to pay per-Diem to the traveling worker. The employer is not contributing to the local service and hospitality industries and once again our economic troubles are related to housing.

Graph: Education Levels --Native, Naturalized citizen, Not a citizen.




As we can see from the graph above, we are not going to immigrate our way to prosperity with highly skilled immigrants in a jobless recovery, we have plenty of educated citizens.  Immigration can however cause more housing foreclosures where persons became unemployed in an ever more difficult employment market.

During the most prosperous and innovative decades (1940s - 1990s) in the history of the U.S., the levels of foreign-born in the U.S. labor force was below 10%,  and the worst decades at 15% and above.


"He [David Ricardo] posited that the growth of population and capital, pressing against a fixed supply of land, pushes up rents and holds down wages and profits." (Wikipedia: Economics)

Source:

U.S. Bureau of Census
“The Foreign-Born Labor Force in the United States: 2007”
December of 2009,
http://www.census.gov/prod/2009pubs/acs-10.pdf

U.S. Bureau of Census
Housing Characteristics In The U.S. - Tables
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/histcensushsg.html

U.S.Bureau of Labor Statistics
Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm

BLS Unemployment Rates by State


Data Table:

StateRank: Highest Percent of Employed Foreign BornRank: Highest Housing Foreclosures per capitaRank: Highest Unemployment rateRank: State Over budget (by percent over budget)SCORE
Nevada41117
California133411
Florida5451428
Arizona8218230
Illinois91091139
New Jersey315171247
Georgia17715948
Rhode Island132641053
Oregon1611111957
Idaho26523862
Massachusetts1017201764
Utah20635667
Colorado19932767
South Carolina32247568
Michigan27823976
Hawaii614441680
Maryland1212362383
Tennessee3422131584
Alaska223328386
Washington1423222786
Connecticut1125242888
Virginia1516382291
North Carolina2336142093
Alabama413281394
Ohio3913103597
Indiana36201630102
Missouri38301918105
New York2392938108
Pennsylvania30342124109
New Mexico18352729109
Texas7283049114
Wisconsin35193131116
Delaware21382632117
Mississippi4640626118
Minnesota24183941122
New Hampshire31274621125
Kentucky45411236134
Arkansas33213446134
Kansas25314540141
Maine43423325143
Oklahoma28294344144
Louisiana40374137155
Iowa37434242164
Nebraska29454843165
West Virginia49482548170
Vermont42504733172
South Dakota48444934175
Wyoming44464045175
Montana50473747181
North Dakota47495050196

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Comprehensive Immigration Reform

A very wise man (my Dad) told me, "It's a good thing we don't get all the government we pay for."

While looking for the H-1B temporary worker program publications which have been missing since Fy 2005, I found a report called, "The Triennial Comprehensive Report on Immigration." Browsing through the 162 page pdf file, I was looking for the information/concerns that would be relevant to U.S. citizens and permanent residents.

Employment
Housing
Environment

I happened upon this priceless quote:

"For the issue areas of the labor market, the housing market, and environmental quality, no specific material is included because the relevant Federal agencies could not provide sufficient information to support such a discussion."

http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Resources/Reports%20and%20Studies/tri3fullreport.pdf


In the 2006 and 2007 versions of Comprehensive Immigrations Reform (thankfully rejected by grassroots activism), the headline of the legislation was an amnesty for the 12 to 20 million illegal- immigrants, but the legislation also doubled the amount of legal immigration. How can our wise politicians, economists and lobbyists support doubling the amount of legal immigration, if they have no data on employment, housing and the environment?

Senator Schumer is taking the lead on the emerging version of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, here are a couple of quotes...

Remarks by U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer
6th Annual Immigration Law and Policy Conference
Migration Policy Institute
June 24, 2009

"Fifth, we need to recognize that reuniting families is an important value of our
immigration system. By dramatically reducing the number of illegal aliens
who are able to enter the United States, we will create room for both families
and employment-based immigrants so that the total number of immigrants to our
country is no greater than today."


I assume that it is yet to be determined whether the total number of immigrants means illegal-immigrants plus legal immigrants. I'm sure the cheap-labor lobby will insist upon some sort of increase. On the other hand, Senator Schumer seems to have a better understanding of the current highly-skilled labor-arbitrage problems/programs (non-immigrant employment visas).


"Sixth, we need to recognize the important contribution that high-skilled immigrants have already made, and must continue to make, toward revitalizing and reinventing the American economy. "

"No immigration system would be worthwhile if it is unable to attract the best and brightest minds of the world to come to the United States and create jobs for Americans—as has been the case for Yahoo, Google, Intel, E-Bay, and countless other companies."

"That being said, any reformed immigration system must be successful in encouraging the next Albert Einstein to emigrate permanently to the United States while, at the same time, discouraging underpaid, temporary workers from taking jobs that could and should be filled by qualified American workers.

"http://schumer.senate.gov/new_website/record.cfm?id=314990



The speech is a pretty good read, a vast improvement over the 2007 version, but I'll reserve any more judgement until after the lobbyists get ahold of the plan -- which again has no housing, employment and environmental input of "...sufficient information to support such a discussion."

Oh wait, here's the price tag for all that government we don't get -- courtesy of Wikipedia.